Latest videos by sonicbomb | hummingbird Videos

hummingbird Related Videos

Attracting Hummingbirds - Hand-feeding Hummingbirds - Hummingbird Nests - Baby Hummingbirds - Hummingbird Feeder - Hummingbird Nectar - Hummingbird Garden - Hummingbird Plants - Hummingbird Moth - Ruby-throated Hummingbird - Giant Hummingbird - Allens Hummingbird - Annas Hummingbird - Black-chinned Hummingbird - Broad-tailed Hummingbird - Calliope Hummingbird - Costas Hummingbird - Rufous Hummingbird - Blue-throated Hummingbird - Broad-billed Hummingbird

hummingbird Sponsors

You like it? Share it!

XB-70 Incident
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 433 seconds

Footage of the 6-engined XB-70 Valkyrie, a 1960s coldwar supersonic strategic nuclear bomber. Features footage of it's maiden flight, wheel lockup and flameout, and it's infamous collision with an F-104 in 1966.

Related: crash, supersonic, xb70

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

this was most ...
By: Raveninety9. on 18 Nov 08, 04:02:44
this was most prettiest thing you would see after the event of a nuclear aftermath

During normal ...
By: ignoblius. on 18 Nov 08, 00:34:04
During normal flight,the seats were about 2 ft. in front of their escape pods. The ejection sequence required that the seat retract backward into the pod so that the pod doors could shut. The retract mechanism for the co-pilot's seat couldn't overcome the plane's high-G flat spin, so the eject sequence for his seat could not start. The pilot couldn't help, having his arm caught in the door of his own escape pod, though he finally managed to eject.

the flight incident ...
By: guguigugu. on 16 Nov 08, 18:52:49
the flight incident was just the final drop. by the time the XB-70 was done, it was already unnecessary. the new anti-aircraft defense sistems negated its two main advantages over a B52 that it was supposed to replace - high speed and high altitude. then the ICBMs came to the scene and the entire concept of a nuclear bomber became unnecessary.

hmmm... i don't ...
By: guguigugu. on 16 Nov 08, 18:25:52
hmmm... i don't think so... the USAF neded a nuclear bomber that could fly very fast at very high altitudes, to avoid interceptors and successfully deliver its payload. the XB-70 was a direct result of such endeavours. the XB actually means "prototype bomber" a super-sonic transport is not really something that any armed force would require.

The only remaining ...
By: JoeyLeafRunner. on 16 Nov 08, 08:09:12
The only remaining XB-70 is at Wright-Patterson AFB can't wait to see it next month.

The XB-70 was a SST ...
By: greendaysaint8302. on 15 Nov 08, 03:31:15
The XB-70 was a SST prior to being adapted for supersonic bomber research

BTW...why the fuck ...
By: aluisious. on 14 Nov 08, 07:56:23
BTW...why the fuck wouldn't one pilot ejecting automatically make both pilots eject? In what POSSIBLE scenario would only one pilot want to leave the aircraft in a rocket propelled chair while the other stuck around to see what was going to happen?

Back in the day we ...
By: aluisious. on 14 Nov 08, 07:52:41
Back in the day we used to get shit done. These days it takes 15 years for an idea to get out of a committee.

Wow excellent video ...
By: DianeDi. on 13 Nov 08, 22:33:38
Wow excellent video... thanks for posting!!! That has to be the strangest looking plane but how amazing was that voyage.

if i was in charge ...
By: joshs088008. on 09 Nov 08, 03:49:08
if i was in charge of that project, i would have been saying "what a failure". its a wicked aircraft though

definitely not. the ...
By: guguigugu. on 07 Nov 08, 01:51:12
definitely not. the design is similar because both are supersonic, but that's it. XB-70 was an advanced american bomber prototype, and the concorde was a british-french passenger plane.

Is this a ...
By: specifictender. on 06 Nov 08, 20:27:51
Is this a predcessor of the Concorde?

Designed with ...
By: leefish1. on 06 Nov 08, 05:03:07
Designed with pencil, paper, and slide rules. Piloted by those with brass balls... Those days will truly never pass this way again...

if BS that they ...
By: battlefield2maniac. on 02 Nov 08, 17:00:40
if BS that they stopped this b/c of a idiotic f-104 pilot

And this stunning ...
By: TerryBogardHimself. on 01 Nov 08, 03:54:11
And this stunning aircraft was created before the advent of computer-aided design, powerful mathematics and simulation software. Definitely one of the top tier achievements in aerospace engineering history.

Its like something ...
By: uggla03. on 26 Oct 08, 18:42:17
Its like something from another planet

Thank you for ...
By: michchap. on 24 Oct 08, 15:03:16
Thank you for sharing this video. As a former pilot I can appreciate the dangers of an experimental aircraft.

I got to see this ...
By: longlakeshore. on 14 Oct 08, 10:43:37
I got to see this XB-70 fly over on it's way to the AF Museum at WPAFB in Dayton. On a sunny winter day in 1969, our entire grade school went outside and looked up as it flew over Beavercreek, Ohio. It was beautiful.

I'm 58 and back ...
By: beneehall. on 14 Oct 08, 04:08:44
I'm 58 and back then, I made a free flight, engine powered model of this wonderful plane. A tribute to the design, the model plane flew with stability and grace with no radio control at all. I should build an RC version with a couple of model turbines.

What an epic ...
By: TheTurbinator. on 04 Oct 08, 05:00:52
What an epic failure.

You are correct. ...
By: gjkam. on 01 Oct 08, 16:55:08
You are correct. When I got to Edwards as a young techie in may of 1966, it had already been decided that the two to be finished (of the three already started), would be testbeds. Joe was widely regarded to be the best pilot in the Free World.

You are correct. ...
By: gjkam. on 01 Oct 08, 16:49:28
You are correct. The reason for the flight was to take photos of the A/C we had at Eddies with GE engines - we lost that new bird and two test pilots for a PR stunt. It was June 8, 1966, two days from my 22d birthday. I was a young excited kid on my way back from my first predawn B-52 Mothership/X-15 checkout, when Joe Walker, whom I had never met, taxied up beside the van I was driving, waved to the two of us inside, and went on his way. He never came back. And I never forgot it.

Actually, I meant ...
By: gjkam. on 01 Oct 08, 16:32:01
Actually, I meant the MiG 21. And I accidentally ran into the guys who went up in the Blackbirds and set those records, by bumbling into their office one day looking for Finance in the wrong building. They were gracious and very approachable. I wanted to ask for a pic with their signatures, but had to maintain whatever cool I could muster.

You mean MiG-25, ...
By: omglollmao123. on 29 Sep 08, 23:01:15
You mean MiG-25, that was the high speed intercepter MiG-23 is the "Flogger", the Soviet old fighter

the thing is huge
By: CaptN0ob. on 26 Sep 08, 03:19:15
the thing is huge

Tornado
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 298 seconds

A music video featuring footage of tornados. Soundtrack is The Prodigy - Climbatize.

Related: lafayette, lightning, south, storm, tennessee, texas, tornado, twister

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

We had a tornado ...
By: fiona3637. on 18 Nov 08, 16:04:39
We had a tornado hit near here at 3am. A big F3. 26 people were killed. One guy who survived said he was asleep and then he was flying in the dark and hit the ground. Broke his back. His whole family was killed. Tornadoes in the middle of the night are truly terrifying because at least in the day you can tell there is bad weather, you are awake, and you can be tuned to radio or tv to warn you it is coming. A heavy sleeper may not even wake for a strong storm.

i forgot how are ...
By: peterRML. on 18 Nov 08, 03:17:59
i forgot how are tornadoes formed?

its scary to get so ...
By: hi5534. on 17 Nov 08, 21:09:02
its scary to get so close you can see the thing spin.

2:50
By: ryanboi6. on 17 Nov 08, 16:23:01
2:50

roflamo the tornado ...
By: mycatownsurdog. on 16 Nov 08, 22:42:09
roflamo the tornado at 1:00 is from the commercial "boom deh ya da" and the guy says "i love tornados!"

this song totally ...
By: mycatownsurdog. on 16 Nov 08, 21:59:57
this song totally matches this video

amazing phenomona
By: aholebunchofans. on 16 Nov 08, 16:04:00
amazing phenomona

tornados in the ...
By: cassybby8. on 16 Nov 08, 04:24:02
tornados in the dark r the worst! But So EXTRODINARY!

What a mass!!, a ...
By: digimikeh. on 16 Nov 08, 01:50:10
What a mass!!, a super big tornado, anyone knows what it's diameter?.

Phenomenal video
By: juderson2. on 15 Nov 08, 23:51:58
Phenomenal video

great phenomenom
By: royalhuskyyy. on 15 Nov 08, 15:28:10
great phenomenom

At 2:53 it looks ...
By: TheSpyder15. on 14 Nov 08, 04:07:22
At 2:53 it looks like a cow in the debris cloud at the bottom left. You just have to look closely.

At THE 1:00 minute ...
By: fiona3637. on 14 Nov 08, 01:26:39
At THE 1:00 minute MARK, I was instantly reminded of that Pink Floyd song....hmmmm....what was the title? Oh yeah....RUN LIKE HELL!!!!!

Thank you for ...
By: CasketGirl. on 13 Nov 08, 23:03:01
Thank you for posting this great clip!!! with really the best music for it!! :D greetings From Holland!

I find nature scary ...
By: EliteKnight12. on 13 Nov 08, 13:08:49
I find nature scary but as the same time naturle becuase it is tornadoes happen and always will and we cant do nothing about it, at least it gives us a show in a sense.

I had a dream about ...
By: sarahnicolehanson. on 11 Nov 08, 23:20:56
I had a dream about the song and the song sounded more louder and cooler. I not saying I don't like yours but I want to put Climbatize on my ipod.

It's so mysterious, ...
By: TheMainTornadoChaser. on 11 Nov 08, 00:24:03
It's so mysterious, it seems evil but not in a bad way in a cool way. Tornadoes in the dark, so awesome

esta perrote
By: raulantonioislas. on 10 Nov 08, 19:23:56
esta perrote

great show,great ...
By: Xzeironah. on 10 Nov 08, 13:58:30
great show,great show

the video is cool ...
By: 6blessed. on 10 Nov 08, 01:03:05
the video is cool but that sure is some fucking annoying music! GOD!...just turn it off!

Check the ...
By: sonicbomb. on 09 Nov 08, 23:25:28
Check the description..

damn nature! You ...
By: Silverpaw53211. on 09 Nov 08, 23:01:34
damn nature! You scary!

I've heard this ...
By: sarahnicolehanson. on 09 Nov 08, 22:02:21
I've heard this song many times before but I haven't got a clue what it's called so I keep on listening to find out even though it might take a while.

song is climbatize ...
By: mycatownsurdog. on 09 Nov 08, 21:30:57
song is climbatize i think

What's this song ...
By: Wcoltd. on 09 Nov 08, 21:21:42
What's this song called? It sounds awesome

M1 Abrams Tank
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 230 seconds

The Abrams is the US's main battle tank, and arguably the best of it's type in the world. With its sophisticated electronics and 120mm smoothbore main gun, it is capable of a 95% hit rate at distances of over 4km. It is powered by a 1500hp gas turbine, it is protected by state-of-the-art armour which can incorporate depleted uranium. Music: H-BlockX - The Power

Related: abrams, m1, tank

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

i'm sorry has the t ...
By: cheeseburger04. on 18 Apr 08, 03:37:07
i'm sorry has the t-90 been proven against anything sorry but i am not going to take an opinion of a country that supports a communist president

i dont care what ...
By: ruggs1515. on 18 Apr 08, 01:21:04
i dont care what anybody say about the damn t-90 it aint shit compared to an abrams. and i will let the facts out- the abrams is better protected and better electronics. the t-90s missle aint gonna do nothin to an abrams. Plus with the u.s. army deciding to use TUSK almost as primary armor considering that the added ERA adds the abrams survivability. the t90 has an era that the old DU round could not penetrait so the army came out with the new DU round and i have the say La La Later! to the T-90

same cannon as the ...
By: hkusp45compact. on 17 Apr 08, 21:48:41
same cannon as the abrams fucktard

The LEOA6 IS THE ...
By: g36c1. on 17 Apr 08, 16:24:08
The LEOA6 IS THE BEST TANK IN THE WORLD HAS THE BEST MAIN CANON IN THE WORLD THE RHEIMMENTAL L55. can destroy abrams t 90 s everything

Ineffective? What ...
By: seriousmtb. on 17 Apr 08, 10:31:18
Ineffective? What do do you mean? In modern local conflicts it much harder without tanks, than with them. Imagine Americans in Iraq and Russians in Chechnya without tanks, they would be still assaulting capital cities. And all normal countries prepare they tanks and tank crews BEFORE war, only banana countries put badly-trained people and degraded technic into battle. And no one cares, what are fighting with tanks, they are fighting the enemy, no difference, is is it trained/equipped, or not.

Yeah, this argument ...
By: Keffy3000. on 17 Apr 08, 02:35:49
Yeah, this argument is stupid, all tanks are generally ineffective in modern wars, they are only supposed to be efective against big targets. They're fighting under-equiped, un-trained, hidden enemies. Both tanks are good (Abrams and T90) but they're not in conflicts where they're practical

From Wiki- Bumper B ...
By: rusak24. on 17 Apr 08, 02:25:59
From Wiki- Bumper B-23 TF 1-37, 1st Armored Division - Large caliber shaped charge, then hit by an unknown round, likely a KE (non-DU)- Two hits, one on the rear grills, another penetrated both sides of the hull. Catastrophic damage by fire. Check it out theres more.

still has been ...
By: hkusp45compact. on 17 Apr 08, 01:11:30
still has been proven the t-90 isnt fighting other tanks in chechyna so fuckin can it man and show me proof that an rpg took out an abrams and i will take you to the worlds most expensive strip club and pay for it all

Proven against what ...
By: rusak24. on 17 Apr 08, 01:01:25
Proven against what? Old, inferior, under equipped armys? You think Sadam had new, highly trained tanks? hahaha Abrams is not proven, they are fighting against a guy wearing a burlap sack and armed with an RPG, and still lossing. If thats what you call proven, then so is the T-90. It is fighting in Chechnya right now, against similar burlap sacks, so that makes it proven too right?

maybe a better ...
By: hkusp45compact. on 17 Apr 08, 00:55:12
maybe a better range than the round the T-90 shoots bottom line is its not proven in battle and the abrams is so that makes the abrams the best whatever is on paper doesnt meant shit

Well, because you ...
By: wtfdoihavetodohere. on 16 Apr 08, 04:02:06
Well, because you seem so certain in your views. And seeing that you have so many negative things to say about Americans, I'm curious to know where you get these ideas and how accurate they are. TV perhaps?

Looks like you ...
By: seriousmtb. on 15 Apr 08, 21:31:16
Looks like you don't get the idea, this ERA is probably most advertised armor in world. DU (depleted uranium) sabot has kinetic (not cumulative) hit effect, it's sends ~12MegaJoules of energy to target. Reactive armor won't even see it coming. ERA is very effective against cumulative warheads, and it's NOTHING against an uranium rod.

why r u so ...
By: gumushtr. on 15 Apr 08, 18:13:54
why r u so interested in how i got the information about American people and history?

Hellfire is fast ...
By: seriousmtb. on 15 Apr 08, 15:44:30
Hellfire is fast rocket, ARENA can't intercept it, but SHTORA can block laser beam. Unfortunately, new Hellfire 2 can acquire target using radar (AH-64D Longbow). T-90 has few (about 6 ones) rockets, which require some conditions when using them. M1 has plenty of APFSDS-T, each one can hit it's target on ~4 km range. Anyway, in case of Russia vs. USA conflict(I hope it will never happen), americans will be facing T-72, T-80 and their modifications, and no any T-90's.

Russian K-5 ERA CAN ...
By: rusak24. on 15 Apr 08, 15:37:48
Russian K-5 ERA CAN survive a hit from the DU round of the abrams, because 60% of the energy from the DU round gets used up trying to burn through the armour, so the ERA disperses the 60% right there leaving 40% to do the actual penetration.

This missile is ...
By: seriousmtb. on 15 Apr 08, 13:00:19
This missile is very effective, but to use it as superiority, crew must find a flat place, where they will have at least 5 km of visual contact on enemy. Also this missile is laser-guided, but western tanks have SHTORA smoke screen analogs. Also if there is less than 5 km of open ground, hostile tank will be able to engage russian armor too. M1's smoothbore is capable to hit enemy tank on ranges up to 4 km. And if M1 with DU armor can survive missile hit, russian tank is no match for DU SABOT.

gumushtr - I'm ...
By: wtfdoihavetodohere. on 15 Apr 08, 07:18:03
gumushtr - I'm wondering where you get your information about the American people. Do you live in America?

Funny, i haven't ...
By: rusak24. on 15 Apr 08, 06:40:41
Funny, i haven't seen anyplace where it says the gas turbine of Abrams can run on diesel. The Refleks 9M119 AT-11 SNIPER laser-guided missile with a hollow-charge warhead is effective against both armored targets and low-flying helicopters. The missile, which can penetrate 700-mm of RHAe out to 4000+ meters, gives the T-90 the ability to engage other vehicles and helicopters before they can engage the T-90, missile has further range than round itself.

so can the abrams ...
By: hkusp45compact. on 15 Apr 08, 02:47:57
so can the abrams it runs of any flammable liquid BS nothing will take out the longbow i know it can mix rounds but missles out of tanks arent very practical when tank rounds shoot the same distance

Arena and Shtora ...
By: rusak24. on 15 Apr 08, 02:40:29
Arena and Shtora will take care of Hellfires from Ah-64's. T-90 can mix rounds with missiles, can have all missiles if it wants and vise versa. Mask heat? with what thermals will see through smoke. T-90 has multi fuel engine, can run on anything from diesel to jet fuel to vodka, plus it has heaters in fuel compartment.

ya but in the ...
By: hkusp45compact. on 15 Apr 08, 01:40:16
ya but in the terrain that it will prolly fight in it wont be able to see that far and thats why you have the apache longbow to shoot missles at tanks i would rather carry more rounds for my main gun than missles that i cant use you can mask the heat signature and diesel engines are louder and diesel gels up

yes German ...
By: redfan45x. on 14 Apr 08, 21:18:34
yes German engineering is very smart and good

I don't give shit, ...
By: rusak24. on 14 Apr 08, 05:06:04
I don't give shit, I will give Abrams one thing, the night vision, but with the gun T-90 has advantage seeing as it can shoot missiles out to upwards of 5km, so it can engage Abrams before Abrams sees T-90. Also gas turbine engine has higher heat signature than diesel.

we dont need the ...
By: hkusp45compact. on 13 Apr 08, 20:17:52
we dont need the german engineering its fine as is its already having a replacement tank designed

Not being ...
By: CorkedMagician. on 13 Apr 08, 20:15:18
Not being anti-american. Just saying. the Abrams a nice tank and it has the benifet of being prodcued there making it cheap and easy to get ahold of. Unfortunately you don't get the benifet of German Tank engineering. Theres benifets to both.

TU-144 Konkordski
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 95 seconds

The Tupolev Tu-144 Charger was a supersonic transport aircraft AKA Koncordski, on 15/07/69 it became the first commercial transport to exceed Mach 2, and the fastest commercial airliner ever. Includes footage of the the Paris Air Show 03/06/73 when the aircraft crashed killing all six crew.

Related: konkordski, tu144

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

The Paris airshow ...
By: ragemanchoo82. on 16 Nov 08, 02:46:25
The Paris airshow accident was the result of a mid-air breakup, right? Sounds like this would have happened within the next few flights if it hadn't happened then :(

So, was the crash ...
By: CusterFlux. on 13 Nov 08, 22:04:43
So, was the crash an accident, or was it an "accident"?

In order to improve ...
By: alpointru. on 12 Nov 08, 11:44:18
In order to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of aircraft to cruise M = 2.2, change the shape of the wing (forwardswept ambient part of the front edge and reduced to 76 degrees, and the base had increased to 57 degrees), the form wing has become closer to the "gothic".

The design of ...
By: alpointru. on 12 Nov 08, 11:38:23
The design of serial Tu-144 with engines NK-144A to be significantly upgraded to carry out significant changes in aerodynamics aircraft with a cruising at supersonic mode Kmaks more than 8. Construction of the prototype series of upgraded Tu-144 (004) began in 1968.

At the same time at ...
By: alpointru. on 12 Nov 08, 11:27:00
At the same time at the LII airfield began flying aircraft analogue MiG-21I (A-144, "21-11"), established on the basis of MiG-21S fighter. Analogue was created in Mikoyan Design Bureau and had a wing of geometric and aerodynamic wing experienced a similar "044". Overall, it was built two "21-11", they flew many test pilots, including those who had to suffer Tu-144. After completing the program of test flights of "044" (about 150 flights) and remained in a test copy.

few facts: ...
By: alpointru. on 12 Nov 08, 11:19:10
few facts: Construction of the first pilot TU-144 ( "044") began in 1965, at the same time built a second copy for static testing. Pilot "044" was originally calculated at 98 passengers, later, that figure had risen to 120. Accordingly, the estimated take-off weight increased from 130 tons to 150 tons. In 1967, was finished assembling basic elements of the aircraft. During the whole of 1968 were carried out finishing work and full staffing missing aircraft systems and units.

IT was later ...
By: Raveninety9. on 12 Nov 08, 00:43:50
IT was later revealed that KGB actually stole the plans of concorde even though in some aspects it was a better plane (didnt need afterburners to reach the speed of sound) it was just another competition for the soviet union it was used a few times but never made it commercially

The US has toyed ...
By: madvlad666. on 11 Nov 08, 23:42:02
The US has toyed with sonic boom mitigation for decades. And although they've made progress, they can't make it work well enough to not get sued. Whats more likely: A)The US military can't figure out how to build supersonic airplanes, but an aerospace giant's spoiled rich kid has figured it out with QSST? B) The kid is full of crap, and wasted piles of his father's money with nothing to show for it besides wild promises and CGI pictures? Don't believe everything you read on the net.

the asaf bought 1 ...
By: d1mess. on 11 Nov 08, 00:20:34
the asaf bought 1 along with boeing and the boys to use a a high altitude test platform

I remember seeing a ...
By: dazzy1975. on 10 Nov 08, 23:22:50
I remember seeing a program on TV about this plane, and it looked liked the Russians had scrapped it, but the US was thinking about using it as a new kind of awax plane, can anyone let me know more about this if poss. Cheers.

Didn't know about ...
By: slash65. on 09 Nov 08, 23:25:07
Didn't know about that, I thought sonic booms couldn't be prevented. My bad.

well i think you ...
By: zulquarnainanwar. on 09 Nov 08, 20:24:29
well i think you should learn more aboutBusemann's Biplane before saying that

Relevently true. ...
By: DeltaEagle7700. on 09 Nov 08, 20:09:31
Relevently true. But there's one proposed SST that won't produce sonic booms. Acuality it's prononced as QSST by an American aerospace company. Who will possibly make the aircraft, but not for a proposed 20 years.

Concorde was better ...
By: 92GH. on 09 Nov 08, 18:47:16
Concorde was better, i'm sorry

Reply to ...
By: slash65. on 09 Nov 08, 16:16:20
Reply to DeltaEagle7700: All planes make sonic booms when they break Mach 1. It's science, nothing can be done about it.

Looks like a cross ...
By: redhorse36. on 08 Nov 08, 03:51:51
Looks like a cross between the failed XB70 and the old SST.

To be fair this ...
By: brettv8. on 07 Nov 08, 21:52:37
To be fair this sort of plane would be a pig to fly, there has to be a trade off between high speed cruising capability and low speed handling.

They are assiocated ...
By: LiberatorWave. on 05 Nov 08, 12:05:33
They are assiocated for this project.

intersting, why ...
By: John0619. on 05 Nov 08, 06:15:21
intersting, why does it have the Boeing and NASA logo's in it? i thought the plane was Russian?

Really?! That's ...
By: DeltaEagle7700. on 29 Oct 08, 20:36:36
Really?! That's great! Another aircraft to return the Supersonic era. Although I wonder if cannot produce sonic booms when traveling at supersonic speed. Because if that's the case, it can only travel over the ocean. But it doesn't say. Another thing, "Rather than use a tilting nose, video cameras should provide the crew the necessary views for landings" That design....I'm kinda unconformable for that.

What many people ...
By: nashixe. on 29 Oct 08, 19:36:20
What many people have not realised is that this is a landing gear stress test. The plane was obviously made to bounce in the controllde fashion. :P

Wikipedia: Tupolev ...
By: kibabiba. on 29 Oct 08, 17:47:54
Wikipedia: Tupolev estimate it will be available only between 2010-2015 (((((((((((( But design is cool! From this article: Comparable aircraft Aerion SBJ Sukhoi-Gulfstream S-21

you tell "first ...
By: mogofou. on 29 Oct 08, 17:00:10
you tell "first flight", not "conception".

Bouncing that baby ...
By: Fishnflightbum. on 27 Oct 08, 21:43:11
Bouncing that baby down...

and now its flying ...
By: grazyarnie. on 27 Oct 08, 21:15:51
and now its flying for the NASA

The Blue Angels
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 265 seconds

Formed in 1946 under the directive of Admiral Chester Nimitz, the Blue Angels are the US Navy's Flight Demonstration Squadron. In the course of their history they have used the F6F Hellcat, F8F Bearcat, F9F Panther(first jet), F9F-8 Cougar, F11 Tiger, F-4 Phantom, A-4 Skyhawk and shown here the F/A-18. Hornet. Music: FC Kahuna - 'Hayling'.

Related: angels, blue, display, navy

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

blue ball angles
By: crbassassin. on 17 Nov 08, 03:42:03
blue ball angles

I thought the Blues ...
By: arpnlaei. on 10 Nov 08, 01:59:07
I thought the Blues were like the role models of the nation but NO! #1 and #4 got suspended! This is what I heard: 4 was low flying over a residential area and 1 was dating a 15 year old! If i'm incorrect i'm just an 11 year old kid and I heard this from a stranger at a show

australias jets are ...
By: CalxP. on 09 Nov 08, 02:27:25
australias jets are pretty crap

they never come to ...
By: ewb01. on 03 Nov 08, 11:57:19
they never come to australia, if they did they would be a big hot us aussies love the fast jets and a good show. blue angeles rule.

1:53 - 2:00 is my ...
By: arpnlaei. on 28 Oct 08, 23:38:56
1:53 - 2:00 is my favorite!

I can't wait to see ...
By: arpnlaei. on 20 Oct 08, 21:55:57
I can't wait to see them on to 8th and 9th in the next two weeks at the Kennedy Space Center!!!!!!! Best theam EVER!!!!!!!

thanx
By: KENZOG99. on 20 Oct 08, 10:39:49
thanx

FC Kahuna - ' ...
By: plzIneedhelp. on 17 Oct 08, 20:33:38
FC Kahuna - 'Hayling'.

The Blue Angels are ...
By: abeg2118. on 14 Oct 08, 02:51:29
The Blue Angels are the Best

can u tell me the ...
By: KENZOG99. on 12 Oct 08, 17:27:02
can u tell me the name of the song/artist this video is just brilliant

waoo good music and ...
By: PANTTERO. on 21 Aug 08, 15:41:32
waoo good music and video

the tune is jus ...
By: lilmofo831. on 23 Jun 08, 12:19:40
the tune is jus awsome love it jus imagine layin bak on a summer day :D

WOW. the pilot on ...
By: jeffreyklm. on 12 Jun 08, 18:19:34
WOW. the pilot on 2.45 is pulling some g-force!!

5/5 nice nice !
By: wapno12. on 10 Jun 08, 20:19:00
5/5 nice nice !

Navy.
By: BFGfreak. on 05 Jun 08, 17:09:30
Navy.

these guys are part ...
By: Roflcopter101094. on 03 Jun 08, 06:51:47
these guys are part of the usaf yeh?

Cheers! :-)
By: sonicbomb. on 21 Apr 08, 21:33:05
Cheers! :-)

yeah sonicbomb ...
By: iceberg501. on 21 Apr 08, 14:51:06
yeah sonicbomb awesome video top tune first time i heard this was in the DVD for the film layer cake, i dont know if your luminati but you have to be one of the best video posters on you tube, best of the best well done. still think missle war takes a bit of beating.

to bad scence after ...
By: overlordtank. on 10 Apr 08, 20:35:57
to bad scence after the crash

that video or ...
By: balubbi. on 08 Apr 08, 18:20:39
that video or rather the pilots are awsome o.O i'm watching it for the 10th time and still it's great...

Great watching ...
By: Vitaliiii. on 07 Apr 08, 23:56:13
Great watching experience, great song. Instant 5 stars and fav.

You could of had a ...
By: guyrizza. on 07 Apr 08, 03:14:14
You could of had a heaps loud song but you didn`t thats cool. I like on 2:05-2:30 how that guy is chewing gum i know you wouldn`t be allowed to do that in the australian air force because it supposedly breaks your concentration lol . Nice video .

Five stars O_O
By: BINLADENINDAHOUSE. on 04 Apr 08, 08:53:35
Five stars O_O

Great pick. Thanks ...
By: hherhold. on 23 Mar 08, 14:28:04
Great pick. Thanks much!

FC Kahuna - ' ...
By: sonicbomb. on 23 Mar 08, 14:22:56
FC Kahuna - 'Hayling'. Description updated

The English Electric Lightning
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 243 seconds

The Lightning was an all-British Mach 2 capable supersonic Cold War fighter/interceptor. RAF pilots described it as "being saddled to a skyrocket". Designed as an air superiority fighter, it's role was to defend mainland Britain against bomber attacks. The Lightning served RAF and the Royal Saudi Air Force between 1957 and 1988.
Music: Ian Brown - "Northern Lights".

Related: coldwar, lightning, raf

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

The US Starfighter ...
By: MegaBrits. on 26 Aug 08, 15:48:43
The US Starfighter was inferior. I take you point about my language, but I detest USA's claims to every idea and have no problem with Americans, but their government is historically a corrupt room full of Mafia /Gypo's = 24/7 dirty tricks, murder, lies + stealing. USA simply fund others ingenuity or steal it and this since 1940, is far more "vulgar" than my word. You be bombarded with sick mail from US flamers who say "we own you", are nation can "rape you", and YOU will end up swearing.

I don't think the ...
By: theredraven. on 26 Aug 08, 02:43:21
I don't think the USAF needed the Lightning. They had enough aircraft to fufill the role we had the Lightning doing. Is there really any need to be so vulgar?

Eat shit and die!!!
By: mempea. on 16 Aug 08, 20:52:24
Eat shit and die!!!

Great footage! I ...
By: AgentJayZ. on 10 Aug 08, 04:27:48
Great footage! I overhaul RR Avons for a living, and I have always loved this plane. This was a "no compromise" interceptor, and had so much power it was the first aircraft capable of supersonic flight without using reheat. Todays multi-role aircraft are more practical, I guess, but less exciting.

I recall these at ...
By: gtrtech13. on 07 Aug 08, 04:37:41
I recall these at Coltishall 1970, twin seaters and single seaters, they used to get down the runway and go almost vertically up amazing. When i flew in one the altimeter went round like somebody winding a watch to set the time, and apparently the fuel flow was like someone filling a bath, amazing.

Superb aircraft. ...
By: baconsandwich2007. on 27 Jul 08, 13:49:42
Superb aircraft. Had a flight of these at my RAF pass out parade. Came shooting over the airfield at Swinderby and went vertical right over the parade ground!

Typo = This was.
By: MegaBrits. on 23 Jul 08, 11:40:19
Typo = This was.

This as the worlds ...
By: MegaBrits. on 16 Jul 08, 21:09:10
This as the worlds first supercruise aircraft, and the first to use HOTAS, which all fighters have now.

Says you Yanks who ...
By: MegaBrits. on 16 Jul 08, 21:04:04
Says you Yanks who couldnt wait to get your hands on it, plus a million other things Britain invented. Pity you didnt take our manners as well - Your mindless scum.

Ok Jeremy Clarkson
By: Griplund. on 11 Jul 08, 11:15:58
Ok Jeremy Clarkson

My father was in ...
By: EnochPowell2008. on 06 Jul 08, 22:20:05
My father was in the RAF, I remember these well. Fantastic. The F1 variant, XN723 was the first F2 to fly July 1961. It entered service with 19 Squadron RAF Leconfield in December 1962. That was our last posting. What memories!

Reasons to be proud ...
By: kn1ghtstemplar. on 04 Jul 08, 10:07:03
Reasons to be proud to be English part 1.000.000.

Ya noone cares. ...
By: jayers2. on 06 Jun 08, 06:19:36
Ya noone cares. Thats in the past.

We brits invented ...
By: sonofhendrix. on 30 May 08, 09:52:16
We brits invented radar!

Does anybody hear ...
By: adapterman2. on 17 Apr 08, 14:45:07
Does anybody hear that sound from Ian Brown ? Leave out pictures, lay back and enjoy the music you military people

Magic. The only ...
By: amaclach. on 29 Feb 08, 01:37:48
Magic. The only plane that intercepted a U2 at altitude (Came down on it and intercepted at 88,000 ft!!!) and Concorde. Considering Concorde cruised at 60,000 ft and Mach 2, that's a pretty big feat...

ok, got it. thx.
By: trident3b. on 17 Feb 08, 12:41:34
ok, got it. thx.

Read the description
By: sonicbomb. on 15 Feb 08, 13:37:31
Read the description

Great footage of ...
By: Bassmaster86. on 15 Feb 08, 02:40:21
Great footage of two Lightnings being refuelled by a Victor

ever get an answer ...
By: trident3b. on 05 Feb 08, 21:45:38
ever get an answer to your music question? I rather like it too...

salute the ...
By: terencehooper. on 01 Feb 08, 02:14:45
salute the poster-more mate!

Heh, no, you used ...
By: xnoybis2002. on 21 Jan 08, 22:49:57
Heh, no, you used your semi active radar homing Sparrows and wondered why the VCs gave you a tonking!!!

well if we copied ...
By: 1z1q. on 21 Jan 08, 22:24:32
well if we copied your missiles that means they would have been the ones used in vietnam do i have to tell you how shitty they where

Also, the Red Top ...
By: xnoybis2002. on 21 Jan 08, 22:16:46
Also, the Red Top missiles carried by Lightning were the first all-aspect AAM which had their own internal guidance in both IR and radar guises! The Yanks always copy us Brits... lol

yeah and the comet ...
By: 1z1q. on 20 Jan 08, 03:43:06
yeah and the comet was the first jet airliner ouch

Demolition
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 172 seconds

Music video using footage of demolitions and implosions. Music: Poison by The Prodigy.

Related: demolitions, music, prodigy

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

hell ya, this is ...
By: Gannondorf7. on 13 Nov 08, 00:51:11
hell ya, this is the fun part of civil engineering

timing those ...
By: toffeespartan. on 12 Nov 08, 19:26:47
timing those explosions so well must take some brains to pull off.organ boi, This 'Music' was created by one of the most influential bands of the 90's.Prodigy RULE.i think the last building or the bridges looked the coolest demolitions

isn't it cool?? ...
By: thehellkeeper2110. on 11 Nov 08, 19:08:39
isn't it cool?? civil engineering rules :D

Someone commented ...
By: torxbutt. on 11 Nov 08, 17:37:15
Someone commented on a kapla building collapse video and said "STOP KILLING INOCIENT BUILDINGS!" I think that's funny... so STOP KILLING INOCIENT BUILDINGS

WHAT A WASTED ...
By: Kauboy84. on 11 Nov 08, 05:42:53
WHAT A WASTED BILLIONS DOLLARS!!!

implosions r just ...
By: Patriotfrosh15. on 08 Nov 08, 05:01:56
implosions r just so cool to watch. I like it

Where's 0:35 - 0:42 ...
By: AlexNorthampton. on 07 Nov 08, 21:07:35
Where's 0:35 - 0:42 ??

there are 3 famous ...
By: IFuckUBitch. on 06 Nov 08, 09:49:05
there are 3 famous building demolitions u should put in this video, for educational purpose lol

just about the ...
By: organboi. on 04 Nov 08, 00:29:36
just about the sickest dumbest "music" i have ever heard in my entire life. boo hiss. and why the fast motion so much? otherwise, a shocking and fascinating collection.

No problem. I know ...
By: sonicbomb. on 27 Oct 08, 21:20:14
No problem. I know there are those who believe that the collapse of the WTC was a government conspiracy. They are welcome to their opinions, but 1-I don't appreciate them being launched from my video 2-A bit of bloody respect should be shown for the thousands of of people who died that day. All further mention of WTC on this video will result in the commenter being deleted and blocked.

That's why I said ...
By: simeoneous. on 27 Oct 08, 18:06:13
That's why I said building 7 specifically, as (supposedly) no-one died in this collapse. But point taken, I was being distastefully facetious, I'm sorry.

No WTC? Strangely ...
By: sonicbomb. on 27 Oct 08, 17:56:49
No WTC? Strangely enough I thought putting footage of an event where 2,749 people died, in amounst some civil demolitions was a little inappropriate.

Looked like there ...
By: simeoneous. on 27 Oct 08, 16:57:40
Looked like there were some buildings of architectural interest wiped out there. All they needed was a bit of TLC. Bummer. WTC 7 would have fit nicely in amongst that lot too.

sweet destruction!
By: MEC316. on 27 Oct 08, 05:13:41
sweet destruction!

greed
By: photolitherland. on 26 Oct 08, 19:24:36
greed

Most of the ...
By: nayarules160192. on 23 Oct 08, 17:19:16
Most of the buildings were great. Why were they demolished?

do they keep bad ...
By: gippi86. on 22 Oct 08, 20:05:28
do they keep bad children inside?

HELL YEAH!
By: VictorArayaT. on 21 Oct 08, 16:23:20
HELL YEAH!

eso!!! que vuele ...
By: caraconmierda. on 18 Oct 08, 20:47:31
eso!!! que vuele todo a la mierda! jojo :P

that building at 00 ...
By: isokessu. on 17 Oct 08, 13:48:34
that building at 00:27 looked so good why did they destroy it?

YES ...
By: AUSSIEMADMATT. on 17 Oct 08, 07:54:31
YES DESTRUCTIONNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!

wait a second that ...
By: paganrandy. on 15 Oct 08, 02:31:17
wait a second that doesnt look anything like the wtc bombings.

oops at 0:24 its ...
By: stickmanpwner64. on 13 Oct 08, 22:25:34
oops at 0:24 its the empire state building. heh

dude its still there
By: ZachManN64. on 13 Oct 08, 18:23:47
dude its still there

Awesome shots! The ...
By: chrisgallo99. on 13 Oct 08, 16:08:31
Awesome shots! The tune's more irritating than anything on Earth.

B-2 Spirit
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 270 seconds

Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit is a multi-role stealth heavy bomber. The B-2's composite materials, special coatings and flying-wing design all contribute to its "stealthiness." One of the most expensive planes ever built: estimates for the costs per plane range from 1.1 to 2.2 billion USD. Music: Massive Attack - 'Future Proof'.

Related: b2, bomber, spirit, stealth

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

i like this plane, ...
By: arroy624. on 18 Nov 08, 18:15:24
i like this plane, too bad it's not supersonic tho

a piece of art, ...
By: canariojoe. on 09 Nov 08, 02:28:36
a piece of art, indeed ...

the US had the ...
By: NJRocks281. on 06 Nov 08, 13:59:36
the US had the flying wing before Horten you dipshit. Jack Northrup and American invented the flying wing 10 years before the Germans.

I guess this plane ...
By: Judasami. on 27 Oct 08, 20:08:09
I guess this plane has a lot of drag force :)

CANT FUCK WITH U.S
By: Gunitgorillaz50. on 29 Sep 08, 02:12:44
CANT FUCK WITH U.S

Ground radar using ...
By: syntaxerror9. on 21 Sep 08, 23:20:38
Ground radar using TV waves can localize B2!

I fly the B1-B out ...
By: LittleMoosehoof. on 13 Sep 08, 23:20:09
I fly the B1-B out of Dyess AFB Texas, the only drawback this aircraft has besides it's pricetag is it is slow as hell, Mach .88 at 45,000 ft, so if an enemy aircraft happens to just see the plane, never mind radar it's going down. The B1-B's top speed is classified but I have had it at Mach 1.36 at 350 ft...

Forget about ...
By: macanix. on 05 Sep 08, 21:57:33
Forget about getting a radar lock on one of these babies... even synthetic aperture radar would not get a return signal. And to make matters more difficult, even if you "stumbled" into one and got a visual (unlikely as missions are night flights) heat seekers cannot lock onto these planes due to the vented engine outlets. Even if they did get a lock, the missiles are easily fooled by decoy flares as the flare has a higher heat signature than the engines themselves...

this is a repainted ...
By: hthtyun. on 28 Aug 08, 09:16:28
this is a repainted Horten 229!!...Yes I suggest, US should dedicate to R'N'R.For War ,Germans aaaallll time!

you sound like a ...
By: Sasquatch279. on 23 Aug 08, 11:58:11
you sound like a jealous sweed, it would be easy to shoot down if enemy fighters could actually see the damn thing but thats the problem and why one has NEVER been shotdown, the only stealth aircraft to be shot down was a F-117 by a SAM missile in serbia.

i have dipshit
By: NJRocks281. on 21 Aug 08, 20:35:45
i have dipshit

Then DO your ...
By: blackArt2000. on 21 Aug 08, 17:17:18
Then DO your research "NJROCKS281"

kid your not making ...
By: Dogmeat7. on 16 Aug 08, 11:04:25
kid your not making any since lol. it's a BOMBER. the handling is just fine as one pilot told me. it's also a dream to fly. you think when they were making a B-17 in ww2 they were wondering if it coudl do cool flips? lol. the point of the aircraft is to sneak in drop a massive payload an sneak out. handling? lol.

litsen man, in a ...
By: 95roddy95. on 16 Aug 08, 10:47:41
litsen man, in a fighter aircraft 30 precent is flown by computers, rest (70 precent) is flown by pilot. BUT in a flyingwing aircrat its is 70 Precent flown by computers and 30 precent by pilot thats why it got bad handling!

dude how can it ...
By: Dogmeat7. on 15 Aug 08, 20:13:06
dude how can it have bad handling if it's flown by COMPUTERS!!!!!! IT'S NOT A DAMN FIGHTER JET IETHER!

= bad handlig
By: 95roddy95. on 15 Aug 08, 08:22:26
= bad handlig

lol handling it's ...
By: Dogmeat7. on 14 Aug 08, 23:38:55
lol handling it's flown by computers lol.

This is where you ...
By: tophatter94. on 14 Aug 08, 20:08:04
This is where you are wrong! The B-2's flying wing design gives it good handling characteristics, as well as stealth capability! Some pilots even say it has "fighter-like" handling, due to it ailerons and certain controls in the wing (honestly, I forgot what they're called.). Now, probably like you, I have never flown a B-2. But my uncle is a mechanic on the B-2, this is what I base my logic off of. And please if you want to continue this arguement do it in the for of an E-mail or IM.

and who the fuck ...
By: 95roddy95. on 14 Aug 08, 08:13:40
and who the fuck are go back to your natzi country you wannabe americans

could you use your ...
By: 95roddy95. on 14 Aug 08, 08:13:04
could you use your brain some more??? EVERY flying wing aircraft got bad handling.

Explain it's ...
By: tophatter94. on 13 Aug 08, 20:44:36
Explain it's high-success rate and accuracy during combat. How do you know it has bad handling? Have you even riden in one?

wich materials are ...
By: stahlwerke. on 10 Aug 08, 16:11:14
wich materials are not so good exactly? What extreme conditions? The sky is very cold at bombing altitude, everywhere. It always lands at the same base. Wich it handles well. How is it easy to shoot down? What exact examples do you have? - Not beautiful? It was developed to powderize enemies. Sorry there's no subtile Russian design elements on it.

lol if its beatiful ...
By: 95roddy95. on 10 Aug 08, 09:02:59
lol if its beatiful.... i dont think so. its also easy to shoot down because it got bad handling. The materials are also not good in extreme conditions. so the b-2 SUCKS ASS

take this hodges, ...
By: 350twinturbo350. on 09 Aug 08, 04:45:47
take this hodges, ur old crappy under tech equipment cant touch this, im glad to see what our tax dollars go to greatly appreciated, to see what protects our country, simply an amazing aircraft i love the 80,000 lb bomb capacity, and the 56,00 ft celing,

i heard from ...
By: shootemup500. on 31 Jul 08, 18:44:09
i heard from weaponology (a show on the military channel) a few interesting things about recent stealth aircraft. a u2 spy plane has the radar signature of a wooden barn, while the f-22 raptor has the radar signature of a barn door. however, the b2 spirit has the radar signature equal to that of a small anemic bird.

Su-47 Airshow
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 102 seconds

Russian airshow footage of the Sukhoi Su-47 Berkut being put through it's paces

Related: airshow, berkut, su47

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Indeed, back in ...
By: shockolanu. on 17 Nov 08, 19:02:19
Indeed, back in 1950's hydraulics were regarded as reliable and suitable for planes. The air pump doesn't lose liquid, it brakes much rarely than the hydraulic pump and, in case it loses air, you can always aid it with the airflow outside the airplane, like a backup option. The pump breaks, you have the air outside turned into a pump by using a chamber and a valve to direct it to the wing and tail ailerons.

I heard about such ...
By: shockolanu. on 17 Nov 08, 18:59:07
I heard about such incidents. Think about this: you design the computer that controls the UAV in such manner that, if it loses the connection with the satellite, it can calculate it's last position, speed, direction and destination. You can program the computer to keep on course until it gets it's new position from the satellite. This way, it doesn't get lost and it waits on track to get it's new position. It recalculates the trajectory and keeps on course with no real detours on it's trajectory

Well the jet I ...
By: ajaf1656. on 17 Nov 08, 18:58:14
Well the jet I worked on was flying over Russa back in the late 1950's and is still the leading source of battlefield recon. It is old.

The USAF has had to ...
By: ajaf1656. on 17 Nov 08, 18:54:05
The USAF has had to call around looking for one of their UAV's that got lost. It lost communications and ended up landing at some remote airport in Australia. Haha!

I consider that ...
By: shockolanu. on 17 Nov 08, 18:52:02
I consider that hydraulics is old. Pneumatic gas controls are more reliable and more inexpensive to build.

Not yet, next ...
By: shockolanu. on 17 Nov 08, 18:46:58
Not yet, next summer I will. I now have to prepare my finishing paper. After that, I need to pass all the exams and at the end, I will probably work for IAR on different projects. Shitty ones, I might add. Yes, I can design the wing and I can program a computer system to control the surface. In my opinion there is no need for wireless remote control. It can all be done by GPS. You give it it's destination and the computer guides the plane where it needs to be. All by satellite.

So you mainly work ...
By: ajaf1656. on 17 Nov 08, 18:40:03
So you mainly work on wing design for UAV's? That's neat. I have a lot of ATC friends too. I was hoping to discuss the integration of avionics and aerodynamics. My jet was controoled by cables and hydrolic controls, no fly-by-wire at all. Do you design the wing shape and the computer systems that move the flight control surfaces?

I specialize in ...
By: shockolanu. on 17 Nov 08, 18:29:49
I specialize in wing design for planes and missile rockets at the Romanian Aeronautic Institute. The flight controls are directed by the control tower. People who direct planes have to study something else. I have friends that work at control towers. They are under some stress. I also finished the Informatics school and I can work on implementing GPS guidance on missiles and UAV. What would you like to discuss about?

I know what ...
By: ajaf1656. on 17 Nov 08, 18:25:25
I know what avionics are. My question was what roll does an avionics expert play in wing design? I'm not trying to debate you on the subject. I am just interested if maybe the aerodynamic design of a wing has anything to do with the avionics. I was crew chief in the USAF and the flight controls were handled by a different shop than the avionics shop. They dealt with the GPS INS MFD's ect. No need to get rude, you said you were an expert and I thought you might be able to answer the question.

Look it up on ...
By: shockolanu. on 17 Nov 08, 17:44:57
Look it up on Google!

What area of wing ...
By: ajaf1656. on 17 Nov 08, 16:01:50
What area of wing design does an avionics guy deal with?

It would have been ...
By: shockolanu. on 16 Nov 08, 15:37:07
It would have been silly for me to say that the forward swept wing is new. The revolutionary innovation is the angle of those wings. You are wrong. The wing design allows the plane to turn at supersonic speed. It doesn't have the same maneuver capability but, then again, who fights at supersonic speed? Indeed, the wing doesn't have all the hard points it needs. They will improve it. Compared with the German and US, FS wing planes, this is GOD! The wing can be tricked to act good in supersonic.

Then you ...
By: sierra190MK. on 15 Nov 08, 20:43:12
Then you acknowledge that FS-Wings concept is nothing new; right? If the SU-47 FS-Wing design is so "revolutionary" why has'nt it been seen being tested for sustain +&- high G turns at beyond super sonic speed? It's because the Russian recenly tried and the jet almost broke apart: they found micro fractures along the wings' base, which is the same problem encounterd by the Germans & Americans. Until you graduate and solve this problem there's no need for me to talk to you. Have a nice day!

Look man, I know ...
By: shockolanu. on 15 Nov 08, 15:12:23
Look man, I know more about avionics than you do. I specialize in wing design. Both for planes and for missile rockets. Next year, I will finish schooling and I will be an aeronautic engineer. The forward swept wing is nothing new, I know. The forward swept wing designed for SU47 is revolutionary, it has the correct angles of tilt and sharpness. The plane is very stable and if you can figure it out why, then we can talk again. Until then, Cheers!

"The Russians ...
By: sierra190MK. on 15 Nov 08, 05:28:14
"The Russians designed cool wings." Please take a look at the Junker JU-287 from the Germans and the Grumman X-29 from the U.S. first. Foward-Swept Wing concept is nothing new. Its inherently unstable nature is what gives such jet incredible maneuverablity at sub-sonic speed, but it generates too much stress on jet's fuselage/wing junction area when spead exceed a certain point (usually Mach 1.6). This is why you seldom or ever see such jets make super-sonic turning flight demo.

Some credit, not ...
By: shockolanu. on 12 Nov 08, 02:35:32
Some credit, not much. The wing of the F-22 has obvious flaws. The Russians designed cool wings. Not only for the SU-47 or the old SU-37 but also for the Mig35 and for the Mig 1.44... They are better at aeronautics and at giving the planes great stability and better maneuverability. Indeed the F-22 has never lost a dog-fight but, it has never fought against the Mig 35 or the SU-37. I think it would be an interesting fight. Each plane has it's hard points and it's weak points, even the new F-35.

f22s never been on ...
By: Raveninety9. on 12 Nov 08, 01:12:16
f22s never been on a dogfight & If it has been they wouldnt dare sending him in a sortie against any respectable fighters

F-22 has never been ...
By: bamzooker. on 11 Nov 08, 21:06:57
F-22 has never been beaten in a dog fight . . . give it some credit.

dont like the look ...
By: aaboi. on 10 Nov 08, 22:04:21
dont like the look of the cockpit but everything after that looks great

Hey guys from both ...
By: toudoku. on 10 Nov 08, 02:12:53
Hey guys from both sides, plz don't start another cold war here on youtube. Can't you try to see even military aircraft production as peaceful competition? And if someone still thinks that he has to proove being an alpha male, he should try to live with our closest relatives, the orang-utans, and try to show-off among them. Our world is still too small for cold and hot wars!

Hey "shockolanu", ...
By: 22250rmntn. on 08 Nov 08, 23:46:31
Hey "shockolanu", one more thing before I sign off to you. Please stop posting your bullshit comments on plasma stealth in the "PAK-FA Fighter/Russian Stealth" clips in YouTube. You have already been caught here making fabricated statements about yourself and on stealth technology based on opinion, half-truth, and hearsay. Do yourself a favorite: keep track of the B.S. you're posting because you're making yourself look more and more like a fucken lying douche bag each time you're caught.

HAHAHAHAHA, you ...
By: Odyssey54. on 08 Nov 08, 22:11:04
HAHAHAHAHA, you just proved you don't know shit. There is no such thing as the KGB anymore! It's dead, along w/ Russia's hopes of beating the US in the cold war. "Suck on this" Whoa there partner, I'm not that type of guy. Those kind of homo advances is what got your country chuck full of AIDS, hehe.

Now you're just ...
By: Odyssey54. on 08 Nov 08, 22:06:36
Now you're just making shit up. Now you're claiming every type of passive sensor radar can detect stealth. More lies. And you know about the Aurora eigh? Tell me about it. Are you going to prove it, or are you going to throw another temper tantrum because I called your bluff? When has there ever been a documented case where KOLCHUGA detected stealth?

HAHAHA, do you even ...
By: Odyssey54. on 08 Nov 08, 21:37:09
HAHAHA, do you even know what an "internet tough guy" is? Even the weakest American could kick the shit out of the strongest Gypsy. Especially in your country where he will be weakened by AIDS.

Sure you are, sure ...
By: 22250rmntn. on 08 Nov 08, 18:31:31
Sure you are, sure you are; whatever you say and make you comfortable. Listen gypsy boy. Based on all the idiotic comments you posted and the replies against you it's apparent that you're just another disillusioned, unemployed, Eastern-Eurotrash still living in a 1 bedroom apartment with his parent and siblings. People like you have to bring down others just to make themselves feel better. I'm not going to waste any more of my time replying back as I'm beginning to really pity you.

Rocket Crash
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 166 seconds

A compilation of various US missile systems crashing and burning in a spectacular fashion.
Music: Dinah Washington - Destination Moon

Related: crash, missile, rocket

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

No, they're fake * ...
By: uviuar. on 07 Nov 08, 02:15:37
No, they're fake *rolls eyes*......

yes
By: FSXgta. on 03 Nov 08, 17:44:23
yes

lol okay
By: zdtycse. on 26 Oct 08, 13:47:34
lol okay

These are real ...
By: artwleb. on 26 Oct 08, 05:14:23
These are real failures at Cape Canaveral circa 1954-1959. New and evolving technology was often used in crash (high priority) programs during the Cold War.

are all these real? ...
By: zdtycse. on 25 Oct 08, 11:06:03
are all these real???

intense
By: 0mgsh0es1234. on 25 Oct 08, 00:01:15
intense

Rammstein fire show ...
By: RussianKondr. on 24 Oct 08, 16:43:46
Rammstein fire show! =)))) PS Shit can happens

fail
By: sbrd2. on 21 Oct 08, 20:33:29
fail

Nice compilation. ...
By: bikingchad. on 19 Oct 08, 04:07:40
Nice compilation. I've not seen many of them. I especially found the Bomarc interesting!

Every time one ...
By: Spirals95. on 15 Oct 08, 23:20:07
Every time one crashes I think: "Our tax dollars at work"

A lot of the ...
By: Spirals95. on 15 Oct 08, 23:18:36
A lot of the rockets disintegrate on the pad lol pwnd.

None of these ...
By: hazelwood55. on 14 Oct 08, 21:16:53
None of these missles were manned. Most go back to premanned flight and some are carrying satellites.

i wonder if there ...
By: xXUAEXx123. on 29 Sep 08, 02:15:40
i wonder if there is ppl in those rockets...

Mango64thousand: at ...
By: boogiebrain34. on 19 Sep 08, 02:03:18
Mango64thousand: at 1:41 U can see the guy fly in the air xlqex: Do the US often put guys inside their missiles? hahahaha

dude you read my ...
By: boogiebrain34. on 19 Sep 08, 01:57:36
dude you read my mind

whats he song i ...
By: madpballer. on 12 Sep 08, 05:59:06
whats he song i have been wondering for like two years!!!!! i love the vid too!!!!!

i <3 how you made ...
By: angelzamy. on 10 Sep 08, 07:02:30
i

i laughed so hard ...
By: LuckeeLappe94. on 03 Sep 08, 22:40:36
i laughed so hard when the song started to say " we will go up, up up!" and the rocket was just collapsing lololool

I hope they were ...
By: StealthJPL. on 30 Aug 08, 03:46:59
I hope they were test crafts.

omg is this real ...
By: FREEMANJONAS. on 29 Aug 08, 00:35:51
omg is this real holy crap!!!!!

Dinah Washington - ...
By: thenash19. on 25 Aug 08, 13:06:48
Dinah Washington - Destination Moon

whats the backing ...
By: miggy424. on 10 Aug 08, 05:50:27
whats the backing track???? my lil bro loves it!

lmfao
By: MikeDegen8. on 31 Jul 08, 23:49:39
lmfao

I bet they said ...
By: yelloj. on 28 Jul 08, 18:23:49
I bet they said something similar to columbus back in the day.

does this put ...
By: alderaforall. on 27 Jul 08, 19:05:46
does this put anyone else in the mood for smores?

Slow Motion Drag Racing
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 64 seconds

High speed photography of drag racing

Related: drag, motion, photography, racing, slow

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

High-Speed
Posted by: sonicbomb

Video duration: 177 seconds

Music video using high-speed photography captured using a Vision Research Phantom HD camera. Music: Ian Brown - "Home is where the heart is".

Related: camera, highspeed, phantom

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment