hummingbird Videos
Latest videos by ravious260
![]() |
Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing Posted by: ravious260
Video duration: 601 seconds This video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth is growing. This collides with the Pangea theory. Watch it, you will be amazed. Related: adult, are, bush, but, conspiracy, earth, here, history, important, in, is, know, not, science, space, these, this, very, war, word Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |


Latest comments made on this video:
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 22:58:32
Neal, "but FALLING SOONER.." But in lower gravity, since falling is slower, ruing will be slower as a creatures foot will have to wait longer to hit the ground and move. Running and moving will become impossible in low gravity and they will have to hop. Proof, the Apollo astronauts on the moon had to hop. However, Dino foot prints confirm they walked and ran normally....in normal gravity! You should stop helping me debunk your theory.
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 22:57:48
MorituriMax; "Do all of this with artificial materials and let us know when it is ready." Do you think Kappa would fail the Turing Test?
By: wafflesfly. on 18 Nov 08, 22:52:38
Actually it does make since. You as a human have to forget the Pangaea theory and it will make perfect sense.
By: Jamzer4. on 18 Nov 08, 22:33:35
well done spotting that all the continents fit together....but isnt that obvious since they all broke off the supercontinent Pangea. The current theory of continental drift explains everything the same as this and it makes a heck of alot more sense.
By: MorituriMax. on 18 Nov 08, 22:28:15
The black hole article I linked just now kind of makes neals mumbo jumbo "theories" pale into insignificance compared to the awesome majesty of the universe and the incredible way that it always surprises us with new insights discovered by scientists. Real scientists trying to show us how it really works, not hide it behind all these made up kindergarden things neal and kappa trot out.
By: MorituriMax. on 18 Nov 08, 22:25:48
Black holes are the rhythm at the heart of galaxies. "tinyu rl. c om /Heart BlackHole" kill quotes and spaces to get link to work.
By: MorituriMax. on 18 Nov 08, 22:12:35
neal, "Ben,...Do you know who you are talking to, here??? I don't mean to brag, and in many fields I don't know as much as I might, but as to the working of anatomy, I'm an expert. " Well tell us what institute you earned your degree in anatomy at.
By: nealadamsdotcom. on 18 Nov 08, 22:12:25
Dave, because I know more than they do. Give you an example. The robots, ALWAYS SMALL ONES are suspended running on the track. FINE. Running is bsaed on pitching the body foreward to FALL. The ability if the body to PREVENT FALLING is what running is about. If a body wishes to run FASTER, it is NOT a matter of moving the lags faster, but FALLING SOONER. THEN the legs speed up to PREVENT FALLING. The robots only "run faster" , they don't PREVENT falling. The practical application?
By: MorituriMax. on 18 Nov 08, 22:10:40
neal, "Stan Winston was building a full size T-rex for Jurassic Park. He made the skeleton of Titanium. Each time he turned the upper torso and head,screaming metal and torqued twisted" Let us know when any other friends of yours make a full scale completely accurate human being which can think, move, do sensitive work, and hold conversations exactly like a human, including an exact copy of the human brain. Do all of this with artificial materials and let us know when it is ready.
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 21:08:57
Neal, you don't sound like a 256 processor supercomputer that has actually calculated and confirmed the feasibly of Dino's walking and running in 1 g gravity. You will have to present better, or should I say actual evidence, rather then words. "Estimating dinosaur maximum running speeds using evolutionary robotics. William Irvin Sellers and Phillip Lars Manning"
By: nealadamsdotcom. on 18 Nov 08, 20:20:23
Ben,...Do you know who you are talking to, here??? I don't mean to brag, and in many fields I don't know as much as I might, but as to the working of anatomy, I'm an expert.
By: nealadamsdotcom. on 18 Nov 08, 20:11:37
Ben, Dave etc.He can't land on bent legs because his tendons would tear. An elephant can't carry 3 other elephants on his back. An elephant walks and does not run because if he did, he'd cripple himself in a day and die. His shoulder-blades are evolved foreward to stop his massive head from looking backward and his neck breaking....LIKE A RHINO,..LIKE A HIPPO! TORQUE???? You don't know what you are talking about, Dave. Turn a metal bar and back. Then Add a thousand pound weight to the end!
By: nealadamsdotcom. on 18 Nov 08, 19:57:57
ben, Dave and all. We dont build buildings over a given height from stone and wood, because we know they will collapse. Large building require iron,...because it is denser and stronger and it remains flexible. It is exactly the same with animals as they get bigger. Anyone who studies anatomy and the limits of size,knows there are no hard and fast rules...LIKE BUILDINGS. Design, support principles, requirements, weight distribution etc gives variation, but overall the concept is knowable
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 19:19:07
Neal, here is the paper I've been looking for, it was reported in TV, very interesting. If gravity was less than 1 g, the simulated Dino would not be able to walk or run. It proves Earth's gravity was 1 g during the times of the Dino's & the Earth didn't grow. Estimating dinosaur maximum running speeds using evolutionary robotics. WI Sellers, PL Manning - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007 (p.s. my friend met Ray Harryhausen, I got mixed up).
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 18:53:21
Neal; Also, by the way - torque and twisting has nothing to do with the strength of gravity. Torque and twisting has to do with the horizontal movement of the Dino (e.g. looking Left and Right), not its weight pressing down on its feet.
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 18:35:34
Neal; My friend met Stan here in Dublin a few years ago, a very nice guy, he chatted to young budding film makers. As for Dino's, if you think big Dino's were impossible, then you have to show proof, just saying so is not good enough. I'm looking at calculations & experiments that show they were possible in 1 g, they could be 100+ tons. Also, most Dino's were 10 to 20 tons, smaller then the biggest land mammal Baluchitherium, at 30 tons. "The Size of the Largest Land Animal. JEI Hokkanen."
By: benthedragon. on 18 Nov 08, 18:09:44
there is more to a body then just bone neal. there are muscles and ligament to distribute the force over a larger area then just one stress point. take your arm muscle, it does not connect at just two points, rather it connects at many distributing the force and moment over a larger area. servos connect at two points, focusing stresses in a few small spots. it is very common for people to not be able to recreate what nature has produced
By: nealadamsdotcom. on 18 Nov 08, 17:17:19
Diamonddave. no matter how Stan re-enforced his titanium skeleton, the torque was too great and the whole thing twisted. He finally built it in two parts, top and bottom. and braced the two on a timber structure and into the floor and wall. The film hid the center section with trees.
By: nealadamsdotcom. on 18 Nov 08, 17:16:42
Diamonddave. Engineers and scientists have argued for years. Each, without regard to any Growing Earth theory. You read a paper and it makes up your mind for you. All of these people should go home,...satisfied their debate is settled. Thanx Dave,...How about an 80 ton sauropod? That good too? Friend of mine, just died, Stan Winston was building a full size T-rex for Jurassic Park. He made the skeleton of Titanium. Each time he turned the upper torso and head,screaming metal and torqued twisted
By: Jamzer4. on 18 Nov 08, 16:54:03
no wonder u sit on youtube with this theory and dont take it further...this theory has more holes in it than swiss cheese.
By: Jamzer4. on 18 Nov 08, 16:51:04
so... if this is true how would you explain earthquakes and tidal waves?
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 16:47:11
Neal, and finally, this guy calculated how the biggest Sauropod Dinosaurs walked... BURLY GAITS: CENTERS OF MASS, STABILITY, AND THE TRACKWAYS OF SAUROPOD DINOSAURS. DONALD M. HENDERSON The biggest sauropods had no problem walking in 1 g (today's gravity). So there was definitely no need for lower gravity during the times of the Dinosaurs.
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 16:31:08
Neal, here is another good paper on he strength of dinosaur bones and their locomotion... "Strength indicator values of theropod long bones, with comments on limb proportions and cursorial potential. P Christiansen - Gaia, 1998" Just look at figure 2, it compares modern mammal and dinosaur bones, the graph shows that mammals and dinosaurs have the same general bone shape = they existed in the the same gravity.
By: Diamonddavej. on 18 Nov 08, 16:00:57
Neal, the bones of dinosaurs were solid and resembled mammal bone, not bird bone. See - Fine structure of bone in dinosaurs, birds and mammals. JM Rensberger, M Watabe - Nature, 2000 "After observation of detailed structural evidence for the origin of birds from dinosaurs, and in light of evidence that dinosaur bone tissue resembles the histology in mammals..."
By: nealadamsdotcom. on 18 Nov 08, 12:06:10
GUYS YOU...."BELIEVE" that the Earth, (Lord, save me.)caused all of it's land masses, BAR NONE, to travel and CONVERGE ON ONE SIDE OF THE EARTH,...IGNORE MASSIVE BASALTIC OCEANIC PLATE that would buckle up between these sections,...IGNORE THAT ALL, and JOIN TOGETHER, as if forced or SHOVED TOGETHER into ONE MASSIVE ISLAND, NO-LAND-ANYWHERE-ELSE-ON-EARTH? 2/3's OF THE WORLD....NOTHING but 2-3 mile deep ocean with 7-10 miles thick basalt? Are you ALL INSANE? THINK!