hummingbird Videos
Latest videos by hbrtmran
 |
The Moon Hoax is a hoax Posted by: hbrtmran
Video duration: 290 seconds Hi!! THis is my first video i hope u like it. I choose a random subject and the Mooon Hoax theory came up. I researched the theory but it was just too flawed.Anyways the reasons for that we did go too the moon far outweighed the reasons we didn't. If you still believe we didn't go, go to this website: http://www.def-lo gic.com/articles/lun arlanding.html Related: apollo, hoax, moon, nasa Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Hummingbird videos :: Social Bookmarking 
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
Latest comments made on this video:
By: chokobrest. on 17 Nov 08, 13:34:45
whats with the "emo"??
By: DownWithTheOwl. on 24 Oct 08, 19:29:22
I believe it because I saw it on TV... Always trust Big Brother.
By: reksub10. on 12 Oct 08, 15:56:47
wheres the blast crator if they only took 1 halbarad camers then who filmed the take off of the lander that zoomed out then panned up to follow take off of lander if they could only fit 2 astronughts in the lander due to weight and space how did the get a rover down there c,mon how come they cant go into chernoybol reactor with the apollo spacesuits if they can go through van allen belt then why did the manufactures of the suits said there was no radiation protection.moon landing=toltal bullshit
By: loperspest. on 11 Oct 08, 19:27:56
Bit just any rocket, the Saturn V. To give you an idea of its power, if it exploded on the launch pad, it would have the power of a small nuclear bomb. Your comparing it to a bottle rocket, and exclaiming since it can't get to the moon, Apollo can't. Hardly convincing. In orbit one is exposed to mostly the same radiation, and the ISS dips into the Van Allen belts (the South Atlantic Anomaly) once in a while. Are the brave men and woman aboard fried? Apollo only spent about an hour in the belts.
By: fanbutton. on 06 Oct 08, 08:17:05
If we really went to the moon, why won't nasa show us the landing sites with the lunar landers? You would think that after 40 years, they could show us at least one of the landing sites with a lunar lander. They can photograph the deepest regions of the universe, but they can't show us something a mere 238,000 miles away. By the way, they are delaying, as I predicted they would, all missions to the moon.
By: fanbutton. on 06 Oct 08, 08:04:42
Billions? Its a rocket not a stealth bomber. You know, every country has rockets now...even Iran. I don't think chickenchit countries like Iran are ready to cough up billions of dollars for a simple BS rocket. Manned moon landings were faked. A moon ship must be ray shielded from the van allen belts, the sun, and interstellar space. Unfortunately, that's just too much shielding to boost into space.
By: betterthanblackburn. on 28 Sep 08, 13:22:04
I beleive the care bare
By: Virtualwallvirus. on 28 Sep 08, 03:46:09
Jesus crist dude. Chill out it was a joke. My personal opinion we faked the landing because we were so far behind the space race with russia. They were the first in space. The first man in space was russian. Remeber this is during the cold war. Communism vs capitalism. So we had to figure out a way of outdoing them. Wether it be real or not as long as people believed it then why not.
By: hbrtmran. on 27 Sep 08, 18:44:47
uhhhhh didn't you get that it would cost billions of dollars more than the billions we would use with future tech in the first place??Tell me why would we want to go back to the moon and waste billions of dollars (while in a recession, and were about to waste 700 billion right now on fat cats in wall street)just so we could prove to couple idiots that the previous landings weren't faked???you guys would just sya that those were faked!!! Jesus Christ give me some real proof or shut up!!
By: Virtualwallvirus. on 27 Sep 08, 10:02:23
well then let them use the old technology since its already made
By: hbrtmran. on 15 Sep 08, 05:33:00
do you want to give us the billions of dollars to get there??? YOu have that our priorities our different from the 60/70's. dont let me turn this into a political argument! Back then we were willing to spend that amount of money even after we beat the soviets there.After we got, well bored of it, we just set our priorities elsewhere. They also knew that further moon exploration would be more efficient in the future, that establishing a base their is something meant for the futures tech.
By: hbrtmran. on 15 Sep 08, 05:27:11
proof please!!!!
By: sirpilf. on 15 Sep 08, 05:26:47
oh and i find it hilarious that this week foxnews was reporting on how NASA says china is a chief competitor in space now, and that they may get to the moon before we "return" to the moon in 2019. so starting 39 years ago, we went to the moon TWICE A YEAR FOR THREE YEARS IN A ROW, but now 36 years later, its gonna take 11 YEARS TO GET THERE AGAIN... wow i thought technology gets better, by now we should be having shuttles going to the moon every hour!
By: sirpilf. on 15 Sep 08, 05:26:33
oh and your picture/light argument was so flawed, the pictures people argue about have the sun behind the subject, but your example was a picture of the sun to the far left of a building. a more realistic comparison would be have someone stand infront of a sunny window, take a picture with no flash, and it will cause a silhouette. its common knowledge you moron.
By: sirpilf. on 15 Sep 08, 05:26:10
there are nasa employee's that say the moon landing was fake.
By: life091. on 10 Sep 08, 20:49:25
nice work
By: eugen32. on 17 Aug 08, 10:34:25
good job man! I born in Soviet Union and I do believe Americans land on the Moon.
By: jwest45. on 17 Aug 08, 03:27:18
you can think this, and some others think the contrairy... and they are not all emo... you are stupid... I think that we didn't go on the moon because he have SOME proof, and you think that we went on the moon because...this is what you heard at school ? cool...
By: lumpcouch. on 17 Jul 08, 14:51:19
well except some spelling mistakes but that's ok ^^
By: lumpcouch. on 17 Jul 08, 14:10:36
great work. Don't let moon hoaxers fool you! Stay sceptical.